Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX and Daiwa TD Match 4012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Daiwa TD Match 4012X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa TD Match?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
