Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
