Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
