Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
