Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
