Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX offers a weight of 245g / 8,64oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a total score of 7.38 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
