Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD 20X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
