Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

74.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €212.60
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.