Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Shimano Sedona FJ, C3000HGFJ, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SEC3000HGFJ
Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 2500D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-250
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €163.20
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the durability (8.54 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

There are not much differences between the two comparables