Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

74.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX offers a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX

8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues