Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
55.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €214.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/300
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX edges out Daiwa BG MQ 20000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 20000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa BG MQ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
