Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
