Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

68.60 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight310g / 10.93oz

Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €60.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC5000XGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (150g / 5,29oz) and the ergonomics (6.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX

A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues