Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
68.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX offers a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
