Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
68.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 535g / 18,87oz and a ergonomics of 5.91 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
