Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
51.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa BG
Spinning
57.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.82 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight640g / 22.58oz
Line retireve per crank120 centimeter / 47.24 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €115.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/430
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sienna 2500X and Daiwa BG 5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sienna 2500X offers a maximum drag of 4kg / 8,82lbs, while Daiwa BG 5000X stands out for a durability of 7.82 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Daiwa BG?
Shimano Sienna 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa BG 5000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
