Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
51.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Shimano Sienna 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sienna 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sienna 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
