Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sienna

Spinning

51.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €27.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional

Multireels

55.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.56 out of 10

Ergonomics5.89 out of 10

Gear ratio6:1:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight545g / 19.22oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €169.70
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size40 LH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationLeft
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sienna 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sienna 2500X offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Penn Squall II Conventional?

Shimano Sienna 2500X

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups