Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
51.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sienna 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sienna 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
