Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag

Shimano Sienna, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, front drag, SN4000FG
Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €27.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.51 lbs
Weight315 g - 11.1oz
Line retireve per crank88 cm / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings4 Shielded Stainless Steel

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €99.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeDouble handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and line retrieve per crank (88 cm / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sienna 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag?

There are not much differences between the two comparables