Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch and a durability of 8.63 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX
