Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
91.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €250.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX clearly outshines Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and ball bearings (8). While Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 20 Airity LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
