Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch and a durability of 8.63 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
