Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch and a durability of 8.63 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
