Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.63 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
