Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.8:1) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a durability of 8.63 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
