Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight730g / 25.75oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €205.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size12II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/350

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Aero 4000X
