Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
