Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
