Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
