Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €312.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD stands out for a gear ratio of 4.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
