Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX
