Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
