Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
