Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
