Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a gear ratio of 4.7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
