Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1/2.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1/2.3:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
