Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
