Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
