Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
