Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1/2.3:1, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
