Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
