Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT
Spinning
82.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €143.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000S-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX and Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 23 LEXA LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
