Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X
