Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 85 centimeter. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
