Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
