Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch and a durability of 8.61 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
