Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.7:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- Scoring 8.25 out of 10 (525g / 18,52oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
