Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch and a durability of 8.61 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX
