Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
66.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.81 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €112.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX and Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX offers a maximum drag of 8kg / 17,64lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa Freams LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- At a maximum drag of 8kg / 17,64lbs (scoring 5 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
