Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
